Detective Colon has NO CREDITABILITY, see criminal trial transcript, pages 30 to 43, posted below, for ease of reference.
In sum, ( 1 ) my complaints came first, in June 2005, pg 40, [ yeshiva filed false criminal charges against me four years later, in 2009 ], ( 2 ) my complaints were for FRAUD, not aggravated harassment, see
pg 37 [ this was an attempt to confuse the details of my case with another student's case, a propaganda technique ], ( 3 ) I had NO RETALIATORY MOTIVE, see pgs. 38 and 39, and ( 4 ) the reason no one wanted to do anything was because for FRAUD the school loses its ability to administer federal student loan programs FOREVER, there is no way to re-gain eligibility, pg 41, this answered Det. Colon's question, why didn't anyone do anything, because the consequences to Yeshiva University were HUGE and irreversible [ in fact, I answered this question for Det Colon on the Internet, on a YouTube video in the weeks before trial, and that video will be re-posted on You Tube, as soon as possible ].
Pertinent quotes:
pg 37 " The case involving her aggravated harassment against the university " Not true.
Detective Colon's report to the District Attorney was for federal student loan fraud naming me as the victim, not for aggravated harassment. One year later, at trial, Detective Colon got turned.
pg 39 " I felt that she was filing this complaint to get back at the university for having her arrested for aggravated harassment ", and on page 39, " Sometimes we see that that happens. Somebody gets arrested and they file a complaint against the other person..." .
This is an OUT-RIGHT LIE ! I made a police report in 2005, the university did not file false charges against me until 4 years LATER in 2009 [ the exchange between me and Judge McLaughlin, on page 39, " no, we're not quite done because I reported this in 2005, and the Judge says "Doesn't matter a whit ". Yes, it does matter, because in addition to showing that Det. Colon is a liar, it opens the door to the events of 2005, those events show that the Bronx District Attorney's office, Assistant District Attorney Linda Tacoma LIED to Congressman Weiner's office ----the details are presented in this show, those details show how federal Judge Robert P. Patterson, Jr. lied, too, there is a fiduciary duty to students in the federal student loan program, in fact the word " fiduciary " is explicitly used, as in the phrase " The school, as a fiduciary for the benefit of the guarantee agency,the Secretary, and the student... " ].
In fact, Detective Colon admitted that he made false statements of material fact during trial testimony, subsequently, see page 40:
" Q Detective, you stated earlier that when Ms. Radin came to your precinct you turned her away because you felt that she may have a retaliatory motive in complaining against Yeshiva University because there was a pending criminal action against her, is that correct ? "
" A That's correct "
" Q Now, detective did Ms. Radin tell you the facts of her case that she discovered a falsified promissory note in June 2005 and she reported it to the Jersey City Police Department, got a police report, got a referral to the Bronx District Attorney, had numerous meetings at Congressman Weiner's office, organized the evidence with other student victims etcetera ? "
-----continued on page 41--------
" The bottom line, detective, is this: Did she tell you in detail the reason she was coming to the precinct to file a complaint ? "
The Court [ Judge Edward J. McLaughlin ]: " Either on that occasion or another occasion, did she describe most, if not all, of the facts and the meetings and the reports that she has that Mr. Redenburg has just put into his question ? "
" A Yes, she mentioned many things going to New Jersey and contacting congressmen and other people and I was of the opinion that if she had a legitimate case they would have -- you know, something would have been done already "
Me addressing Judge Edward J. McLaughlin, see page 43: " The defendant: sir, sir the consequences of federal student loan fraud is the school loses its ability to administer these programs forever" . These statutes have already been entered into a higher court, Judge Robert P. Patterson, Jr. 's court, and can be cited to upon appeal, with carbon-copies going to his U.S. Marshalls.
Left-click, once, on any document, to enlarge it, for easy viewing, and, then, left-click, one more time.
 |
| PAGE 37: " THE CASE INVOLVING HER AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT AGAINST THE UNIVERSITY" , Detective Colon LIED on the witness stand, my complaint was for FRAUD, not aggravated harassment, this was an attempt to confuse the details of my case with another student's case, as a propaganda technique; I saw the report that Detective Colon sent down, it stated that I was a victim of federal student loan fraud, a year later, at trial Detective Colon's story changed; ULTIMATELY, HE ADMITTED TO LYING ON THE WITNESS STAND, SEE PAGES 40 and 41. |
 |
| " I FELT THAT SHE WAS FILING THIS COMPLAINT TO GET BACK AT THE UNIVERSITY FOR HAVING HER ARRESTED FOR AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT ". DETECTIVE COLON LIED ON THE WITNESS STAND, I MADE MY COMPLAINTS FIRST, FOR FRAUD IN 2005, FOUR YEARS EARLIER, SEE THE POLICE REPORT DATED 2005, POSTED BELOW, FOR EASE OF REFERENCE. |
 |
| " SOMETIMES WE SEE THAT HAPPENS. SOMEBODY GETS ARRESTED AND THEY FILE A COMPLAINT AGAINST THE OTHER PERSON". DETECTIVE COLON LIED ON THE WITNESS STAND, I MADE MY COMPLAINTS FIRST, FOR FRAUD, IN 2005, FOUR YEARS EARLIER, SEE THE 2005 POLICE REPORT POSTED BELOW, FOR EASE OF REFERENCE. " NO, WE'RE NOT QUITE DONE BECAUSE I REPORTED THIS IN 2005" ME TO JUDGE EDWARD J. McLAUGHLIN. JUDGE McLAUGHLIN RESPONDED: " DOESN'T MATTER A WHIT" . IT DOES MATTER. IT DEMONSTRATES THAT DETECTIVE COLON LIED ON THE WITNESS STAND, A FACT THAT DETECTIVE COLON, ULTIMATELY ADMITTED TO, SEE PAGES 40 and 41. JUDGE McLAUGHLIN DOES NOT WANT TO OPEN THE DOOR TO THE EVENTS OF 2005 THAT SHOW BRONX ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY [ ADA] LINDA TACOMA LIED TO CONGRESSMAN WEINER'S OFFICE, THERE IS A ONE YEAR FRAUD DISCOVERY RULE IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND A TWO-YEAR FRAUD DISCOVERY RULE IN MY UNDERLYING CIVIL CASE---ADA LINDA TACOMA DID NOT TELL CONGRESSMAN WEINER THIS, SHE GAVE HIM INCOMPLETE INFORMATION TO MANIPULATE HIM AND HS OFFICE = A CRIME. THIS EVIDENCE IS POSTED BELOW, FOR EASE OF REFERENCE, SEE TIMELINESS OF ACTIONS, THERE IS A ONE-YEAR FRAUD DISCOVERY RULE FOR LARCENY [stealing ] IN THE CONTEXT OF A FIDUCIARY DUTY. |
CLICK ON THE FOLLOWING LINK, THEN, SCROLL TO THE WORDS HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW THAT READ: " THE SCHOOL, AS A FIDUCIARY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE GUARANTEE AGENCY, THE SECRETARY, AND THE STUDENT..."
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhN93sEzfOVTvKbRVols1l7xJMPGJcsp3BhFaT_w55xeoF-XHhguTAwV69YZBW7UuLbA7IqBfaq2Dxq_xhNhQ9WKPNyxTj08YqTGnFmR_ekDFnqd1y_5tJQ4Q2tewMqDnvJFkgyEAMjsRmB/s1600-h/scan0463+%282%29.jpg
JUDGE ROBERT P. PATTERSON, JR. IN THE FEDERAL COURT, LIED, SO DID THE ENTIRE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, THERE IS AN EXPLICITLY-STATED FIDUCIARY DUTY TO THE STUDENT.
 |
| FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ROBERT P. PATTERSON, JR. LIED--HE CITED TO THE WRONG SECTION OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REG'S---THERE IS AN EXPLICITLY STATED FIDUCIARY DUTY TO STUDENTS: "THE SCHOOL, AS A FIDUCIARY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE GUARANTY AGENCY, THE SECRETARY, AND THE STUDENT..." |
 |
| NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE GIVES ME THE RIGHT TO AMEND MY FEDERAL COMPLAINT AND RELIEF FROM FINAL JUDGMENT. |
Note: Add Dr. Stephen Blau's stipulation at trial wherein he stipulated that I did not fail his ICM class, add this evidence to show 1, to show that John Scarfone has no creditabilty, and that David, Olson, Reichgott and Bennett have no creditabilty, because Blau reported my passing grades to them as members of my Promotions Committee responsible for monitoring academic progress as required in the federal student loan program [ not behavior problems, another one of Martin Bockstein's stupid lies ] and because David and Bennett were directors of the ICM class --- Blau was required to report my passing grades to them too.
No comments:
Post a Comment